The Cost of Containment

Before discussing the merits and drawbacks of China's surveillance tactics, it is essential to understand the stakes involved. The WHO estimates the Coronavirus has a mortality rate of approximately 3.4%, significantly higher than that of seasonal flu and only slightly lower than the 1918 Spanish Flu. Unlike recent high-profile outbreaks like Ebola and Zika, the Coronavirus can manifest with mild or no symptoms, making it difficult for those infected to seek medical care, thereby facilitating its spread.

In a recent piece for The Atlantic, Harvard epidemiologist Marc Lipsitch projected that between 40% and 70% of the global population could contract the virus within a year. With the stated mortality rate, this could result in a staggering death toll, potentially exceeding 99 million, which would far surpass the 1918 outbreak.

However, these projections are steeped in uncertainty regarding the virus's spread, vaccine effectiveness, and public response. Lipsitch cautioned that while many infections may be mild or asymptomatic, the potential impact remains alarming.

The Role of Surveillance

Given these daunting statistics, the global response has been swift, with some nations resorting to "radical tactics" to avert a catastrophic health crisis. Surveillance has emerged as a central strategy in these efforts.

While reports have highlighted China's initial failure to recognize the outbreak, the government quickly reversed course, enforcing strict measures. The city of Wuhan was effectively sealed off, isolating around 11 million residents, a move made possible by the extensive surveillance infrastructure developed over decades.

Drones equipped with facial recognition capabilities are now monitoring compliance with mask mandates, while infrared scanners check for fever at transportation hubs. Additionally, robots are deployed to remind citizens to remain indoors. Reports indicate that the government has even encouraged residents to report on one another, reminiscent of tactics used in North Korea.

As restrictions begin to ease, new surveillance measures are being implemented. Workers returning to their jobs must use a mobile tracking app that assigns color codes (green, yellow, or red) to indicate their health status, determining their ability to leave quarantine or access public spaces.

COVID 19 Surveillance Testing: A Way Out? | Daniel Larremore

This video examines the implications of surveillance testing in managing the pandemic and discusses the balance between public health and individual privacy.

Implications for Privacy and Governance

While the introduction of such an app might seem justifiable in the face of a pandemic, it raises critical questions about privacy and state power. Analysis of the app's code revealed that it could share personal information with law enforcement, a connection that users may not fully understand.

Moreover, the Chinese government has enacted new laws restricting the dissemination of negative information online, ostensibly to promote a positive digital environment and safeguard national security. This legislation underscores a troubling trend of increased governmental control over public discourse, particularly during a health crisis.

Despite its initial shortcomings, the Chinese government's aggressive tactics have garnered praise from organizations like the WHO for their effectiveness in curbing the virus's spread. However, the centralized authority of the Chinese Communist Party allows for swift decision-making, often at the expense of public debate and accountability.

Conclusion: A Balancing Act

In times of crisis, the balance between security and civil liberties becomes paramount. The post-9/11 era in the United States serves as a reminder of how fear can drive the public to accept invasive surveillance measures. While the urgency of preventing a pandemic justifies certain actions, the long-term consequences of such measures must be carefully considered.

The Chinese government's approach serves as a stark example of how surveillance can expand under the guise of public safety, presenting a cautionary tale for governments worldwide. Ultimately, as we navigate these challenging times, it is crucial to weigh the sacrifices we are willing to make in the name of security against the values we hold dear.

If you enjoyed this analysis, consider subscribing to my bi-weekly newsletter, The State of Surveillance, for ongoing insights into surveillance technology and its implications.