Exploring UFOs, Aliens, and Conspiracies: A Deep Dive
Written on
UFO discussions are always intriguing. Take, for instance, the conversation between Joe Rogan and Sam Tripoli about Operation Highjump: Nazis, Aliens, and Antarctica. Watching Joe’s astonishment is entertaining; he seemed completely unaware of Operation Highjump, a topic I thought was widely recognized. Of course, I might be part of a niche group of avid UFO fans. While I'm not a dedicated UFOlogist, my involvement with MUFON suggests a budding interest. Yet, I still feel I need to accumulate more experience and knowledge before claiming any expertise in the UFO realm.
In a paraphrased moment from Tripoli, he exclaimed, “Dude, you’ve never heard of Operation Highjump? They sent Admiral Byrd to Australia, and Nazi UFOs decimated half his fleet after they struck a deal with aliens. Byrd got beaten, and Eisenhower had to negotiate for aliens to be allowed to abduct people from national forests, which connects to the mystery of 411 missing persons…” Poor Joe was taken aback, seemingly unaware of the countless individuals who vanish from national forests, a subject the government rarely addresses. “What? No way! Do you realize how wild that sounds?!”
When you frame it that way, it raises eyebrows. As an admiral leading the strongest Navy post-World War II, if you venture to Antarctica to capture some remaining Nazis and end up losing your fleet, what do you think your Captain’s Log would read? “It’s life, Jim, but not as we know it.”
For context, Operation Highjump took place between 1946 and 1947. Byrd had previously led an expedition to Antarctica from 1928 to 1930, where he claimed to have encountered aliens. This implies that Eisenhower was aware of extraterrestrial life there and chose to confront them after the war.
The Conspiracy Landscape
Surprisingly, I find myself among the “they” in this scenario! Tripoli remarked, “No, Bro, there are like feuding clans of ‘they.’”
There are indeed numerous factions of “they.” Regardless of who wins the presidential elections, accusations of conspiracies from the opposing side abound, potentially pointing to a hidden, secret government that truly pulls the strings, which would indeed be a conspiracy, wouldn’t it? Grant Cameron discusses this in ALIEN — PRESIDENT CONNECTION | Alien Chronicles: Alien UFO Encounters (S1E13). But can there really be a clandestine government operating behind the scenes?
Yet, how does a government that often appears ineffective manage to persist for over two hundred years?
I think I'd prefer to indulge in some lighthearted UFO banter with Joe Rogan. After all, that’s entertaining and amusing. Perhaps a dose of humor is necessary since sometimes the truth is just too hard to swallow. It resembles a catchy list song, like Billy Joel's We Didn’t Start the Fire or R.E.M.'s It’s the End of the World as We Know It. The reality is, there are bizarre occurrences in the world that can drive someone mad, whether in a crazy or infuriated sense.
Is it possible that fluoride serves to pacify the population? Does it obstruct the third eye, making it challenging for individuals to see into the depths of their minds? I’m not sure, but it seems people have consumed non-fluoride water for as long as humanity has existed, and dental health appeared quite good until the introduction of processed sugars. Indigenous peoples, like the Eskimos, were particularly healthy until they were supplied with canned goods. Seriously, prior to our interference, they exhibited excellent dental health, no heart issues, no high cholesterol, and didn’t even consume vegetables! Why can’t they be typical like the rest of us?
Do you think Eskimos ponder conspiracies against them? Who constitutes their “they”? Try saying that quickly a few times to ensure I articulated it correctly.
There remain unexplored mysteries surrounding the Eskimos. For instance, how did they manage sanitation? What practices did they employ for hygiene? Why was the snow perpetually white? And again, they were seemingly healthy until our intervention? Unbelievable.
Some conspiracies have proven to be true. The Erin Brockovich film wasn’t merely a work of fiction; it depicted real events. I particularly liked the moment when she presented those lawyers with tap water, and their reactions shifted upon realizing what it was.
Previously, there was a significant lobbying campaign that led to lead being included in paints, and we’re still grappling with the repercussions today, questioning why IQ levels declined in homes with lead paint. We've known about lead's dangers since Roman times, evidenced by Odysseus' crew growing less intelligent as the narrative progressed. The captain became wiser while his crew became increasingly foolish.
This raises questions about the lobbying efforts against hemp. Was it merely for profit from timber? Were the campaigns against psychedelics driven by a fear that many were awakening to the idea that war is unjust, and even the draft wasn’t recruiting enough suitable men for sacrifice? Was there a conspiracy against Nikola Tesla when Edison publicly executed an elephant to discredit him and rob the world of free energy?
Isn’t it intriguing that almost every conspiracy later proven true stemmed from the actions of wealthy individuals or lobbyist groups intent on preserving their financial interests? This explains why pharmaceutical companies advocate for laws that restrict lawsuits against them. Banks labeling the GameStop traders as villains instead of capitalists illustrates this, as they found a way to circumvent the conspiracy that inhibits people's financial success.
You claim there are no conspiracies? If we supposedly know who was responsible for Kennedy's assassination, why did Trump agree to keep the Kennedy documents sealed for another fifty years? I thought the public was against Trump? If he’s such a maverick, why comply with the secretive government? Can we reverse some of his decisions, starting with the release of the Kennedy documents? Just a thought. Trump was known for his conspiracy theories, so why not release those records?
How much time has been squandered deciphering all the foolishness he propagated and casting blame? Seriously, isn’t that indicative of a third party fostering division and distraction?
Let’s not forget, UFOs were officially acknowledged as real in 2017. The government had denied their existence and interest for seventy-five years, only to reverse that stance, lending credibility to some conspiracy theorists.
Did you know Trump had a remarkably intelligent uncle involved with nuclear matters and reputedly knowledgeable about UFOs?
The conspiracy narrative becomes increasingly tangled here. Hillary Clinton was purportedly set to be the UFO president, according to her “leaked” emails. She was prepared to announce the existence of UFOs, associating with figures like Tom DeLonge. This is significant because DeLonge had made outlandish claims that people dismissed until Clinton's emails emerged, revealing discussions about aliens involving generals.
One strategy employed by Democrats was to endorse rogue or third-party candidates to create confusion and provide an advantage. Clinton even suggested in an interview with the NYT that the media should focus on Trump, anticipating he wouldn’t win. The strategy ultimately backfired.
Thus, if the public was meant to learn about aliens, but they refused to engage with Trump, he couldn't be the UFO president. Yet, Trump established the Space Force and covertly included UFO reports in the COVID relief bill. Some speculate he intended to reveal information about aliens but was advised against it. Have you ever considered what could silence a narcissist?
Could Biden be the UFO president? Can the current president of the United States genuinely inquire why the military has yet to provide Congress with the UFO report? Is he in control, or isn’t he? How about a conspiracy theory there?
Trump wasn’t the only president to comment on UFOs. It’s often approached with humor, yet Clinton displayed a keen interest in UFOs, initiating multiple inquiries and mentioning them in press conferences, even before his famous Martian Life rock speech. Ford, Carter, Bush, Reagan, Kennedy… Obama seemed to dodge the UFO topic but later acknowledged, “there’s something here.” Reagan frequently had references to aliens removed from his self-composed speeches, only to reinstate them afterward.
While conspiracy theories can be entertaining, they can also be exhausting. They often unravel individuals as they attempt to discern the truth. The bizarre world of UFOs and the people involved can be overwhelming, perhaps dissuading some from delving deeper into the subject.
Consider the UFO enthusiasts you know. Some may argue they are eccentric characters. While being eccentric is entertaining and thrilling, it doesn’t necessarily invalidate their claims. This perception of disdain can deter ordinary individuals from engaging with the topic, yet it’s also the flair needed to bring the subject into the limelight. Without showmanship, there is no spectacle.
Who can genuinely digest the thought that Admiral Byrd encountered aliens not once, but twice? The first encounter seemed relatively harmless. The second, however… How many ships did he lose? They describe ships that could traverse from pole to pole in mere moments emerging from the ice and oceans to sink them with lasers. Did the Nazis possess that technology? If aliens supported the Nazis, was it an alliance, or did they simply favor the Nazi regime?
Alternatively, could the Nazis have been outmaneuvered by a more intelligent adversary?
Surely aliens were aware of the global conflict and the reasons behind it. Today, the world, including Germany, regards that war and the Holocaust as a significant dark chapter in human history. Did aliens align themselves with that?
If they did, is that the rationale behind the efforts to keep humanity in the dark about extraterrestrials? Are they malevolent?
Or, are they akin to us, exhibiting a mix of good, bad, and ordinary behaviors, just possessing more advanced technology?
If there exists a multitude of normal extraterrestrial beings, akin to us, could we, as regular folk, connect with their counterparts and bypass the leaders who seem to hinder humanity's progress toward maturity?
Regarding what’s truly happening, I remain uncertain. My experiences indicate there’s something significant going on, yet I lack clarity on what it is. Interviewing individuals reveals that those who focus solely on their experiences tend to come across as credible, while those who provide explanations for everything often appear less trustworthy.
Take Dr. Stephen Greer, for instance. I find his perspective appealing. I strongly resonate with his message that aliens are benevolent. I have no doubt he has had his experiences, and his CE5 initiative likely works. However, one might question if it’s genuinely aliens he is summoning or perhaps archetypes. If people fear Ouija boards, should they also be wary of CE5 or remote viewing? It’s a valid inquiry that I doubt anyone has posed to him.
It seems he doesn’t appreciate being challenged. Curt Jaimungal appears to have faced some challenges, and I often engage him. I suspect he lacks sufficient knowledge of consciousness paradigms to provide alternative interpretations.
For instance, I practice tulpamancy. I consider myself a reasonably normal, rational person most of the time, yet I dabble in unusual, esoteric traditions. I can assure you that if you follow the protocols for tulpamancy, you will encounter inexplicable experiences. These protocols align with Carl Jung’s therapeutic methods of active imagination. If you engage with them, as Jung did, you will undoubtedly have experiences. Philemon is to Jung and his Red Book what Loxy is to me. Napoleon Hill, the author of Think and Grow Rich, proposed a similar method to Jung’s active imagination called the Invisible Counselor technique, and it is also effective!
Engage in these practices, and experiences will follow. Participate in CE5, and you will have experiences because that’s how consciousness operates.
You may wonder about group experiences. Interestingly, there is an explanation. When you place your hands on the planchette of a Ouija board with another person, you’ll find a third entity joining in. Alexandra David-Neel, who wrote Magic and Mystery in Tibet, learned the art of tulpamancy during her time in Tibet. Despite being advised against it, she proceeded and created a Friar Tuck tulpa, believing him to be benign. He became troublesome, causing distress in the entire village, necessitating the monks to dissolve him.
The Philip the Ghost experiment involved a group creating a fictitious character, holding a séance to contact him, and discovering something that either pretended to be Philip or genuinely was Philip. There’s a concept known as the Collective Unconscious, attributed to Jung. The French term folie à deux refers to a shared madness. However, it isn’t madness if a collective unconscious exists, and we occasionally share conscious realities.
We inhabit a consensus reality. Scientists assert that reality is energy, and the observer collapses the wave front. It’s possible we require people to remain asleep in the dream state because if too many awaken from the Matrix simultaneously, the entire illusion collapses! How’s that for a conspiracy theory?
Current earthly existence is an illusion. We’re participants in a consensus dream machine, with our fingers on the planchette spelling out our Ouija board experience, and the world holds more magic than one could ever conceive while entrenched in the roles we adopt.
This is why it’s so entertaining to witness Joe Rogan being introduced to some of the wild narratives surrounding UFOs. Or perhaps what’s purported to have happened. It’s not surprising that numerous synchronicities lead individuals to believe in conspiracies. After all, why engage in a murder mystery game without clues pointing toward an endgame?
recommended:
Donald Trump's Nuclear Uncle
In September 1936, a reporter for the Associated Press observed the unveiling of a new type of X-ray machine, which was said to… www.newyorker.com