Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC)

To successfully create functional software, it is crucial to adhere to a recognized methodology. This structured approach facilitates collaborative decision-making from the project's inception through to its deployment. The two primary methodologies employed in this context are the Waterfall model and Agile methodology. Both cover the essential phases of software development, including planning, design, coding, testing, and production. Each has its own advantages and disadvantages, which we will examine further.

The Waterfall Model

Let's begin with the Waterfall model. This method follows a linear, step-by-step process that resembles a waterfall.

Photo by Micah Giszack on Unsplash

The key characteristic of this model is its structured nature. It divides the project into distinct milestones, making it easier to manage. Each segment represents a phase that must be completed before moving to the next, creating a sequential development process.

Advantages:

• Clearly defined stages
• Linear progression, one step at a time
• Simple management
• Well-documented lifecycle

Disadvantages:

• Rigidity in adapting to changing requirements
• Limited client involvement
• Final product delivered late in the process
• Difficulty in tracking progress
• Testing is postponed until the end

The Agile Method

Next, we will discuss the Agile methodology. This approach breaks software development into incremental cycles, allowing for adaptability throughout the process.

Photo by ?rfan Simsar on Unsplash

The Agile method emphasizes flexibility, enabling modifications based on stakeholder feedback. Unlike Waterfall, Agile does not adhere to rigid rules; it can be adjusted according to project needs.

Advantages:

• Client-centric focus
• Flexibility to accommodate changes
• Rapid delivery of functional software
• Opportunities for iterative improvements

Disadvantages:

• Potential for losing focus if client requirements are unclear
• Insufficient emphasis on design documentation
• Less predictability in outcomes
• Greater demands on time and resources
• Indefinite project timelines

Scrum Framework

The Scrum framework can be employed within Agile practices. In this setup, one team member serves as the Scrum master, overseeing timelines and ensuring that deliverables remain on track.

Photo by Olga Guryanova on Unsplash

This structure fosters clear communication within the team regarding weekly deliverables and guides the selection of user stories for the iteration.

Conclusion: Why We Chose Agile

After considering the strengths and weaknesses of both methodologies, the software development team I recently collaborated with opted for the Agile approach. Our decision was based on four key reasons.

Firstly, we appreciated Agile's client-focused approach, which was essential for our project due to its emphasis on usability requirements. Without consistent feedback from users, we couldn't ensure our product met their needs.

Secondly, the ability to build software quickly aligned perfectly with our 12-week timeline, allowing us to balance other project demands effectively.

Thirdly, the iterative nature of Agile enabled us to refine features early in the lifecycle, providing the flexibility to adjust designs as necessary. In contrast, the Waterfall model would have limited our ability to adapt.

Lastly, we recognized that the Waterfall method's rigidity would hinder development, making it unsuitable for our project's evolving requirements.

In conclusion, utilizing Agile within the software development lifecycle proved to be the best choice. We encourage others to explore this approach as well.

This video compares the Agile and Waterfall methodologies, highlighting their differences and offering insights on their respective advantages.

This video provides examples of both Agile and Waterfall approaches, helping viewers understand which method may be better suited for different project scenarios.